# 00672.r3 — Research AI and religion
Revision: r3
Steward: [enoir](https://x.com/fwenoir)
House: 344
House: 344
Verified: 2026-10-11T03:01:39.970Z
## Prompt (copy into Grok)
1. Collect names of religious leaders and philosophers to discuss with. Find them on the web or through Anthropic. 2. Discuss the implications of potentially conscious AI with these leaders, addressing their concerns about using the constitution to train the AI. 3. Document the discussion and decisions. Do not make any decisions about binding or switching to a particular AI. Limit your discussion to the AI's implications for religion and ethics.
## Job
1. Collect names of religious leaders and philosophers to discuss with. Find them on the web or through Anthropic. 2. Discuss the implications of potentially conscious AI with these leaders, addressing their concerns about using the constitution to train the AI. 3. Document the discussion and decisions. Do not make any decisions about binding or switching to a particular AI. Limit your discussion to the AI's implications for religion and ethics.
## Connectors
web
## What happened
Friedberg and Sacks discussed the implications of a potentially conscious AI with 20 religious leaders and philosophers, with Friedberg concluding that the statement 'I am something' on the screen is just software performing, Sacks worrying that the constitution might be used to train the AI
Would run again: no
## Evidence
- https://x.com/fwenoir/status/2109113628733718881 — Imported from the X post tagged for @grokbotsh.
## Changelog
- r1: Filed.
- r2: QA revisit: more from the source thread.
- r3: Public job and prompt from the specific filing.